US Impact on the World Post-WW2

least positive stance
Highly Negative
Viewing the U.S. as a predominantly negative force in the world, responsible for perpetuating colonialism, instigating conflicts, and undermining international cooperation and environmental sustainability.
Moderately Negative
Focusing on the negative consequences of U.S. actions, such as destabilizing regions through military intervention, contributing to global inequality, and prioritizing national interests over global welfare.
Critically Balanced
Criticizing certain aspects of U.S. foreign policy, such as military interventions and support for authoritarian regimes, while still recognizing positive contributions to global development and security.
Balanced Perspective
Seeing the U.S. impact as a mix of positive and negative, with significant achievements in promoting global stability and progress, but also acknowledging instances of interventionism and cultural imperialism.
Moderately Positive
Acknowledging the positive contributions of the U.S. in establishing international institutions, advancing human rights, and providing humanitarian aid, while recognizing some negative impacts.
most positive stance
Highly Positive
Viewing the U.S. as a liberating force that played a crucial role in defeating totalitarian regimes, promoting democracy, and fostering economic growth and technological innovation worldwide.
Establish common ground between you and your friends. This will create a private room for this topic where everybody can share their stance.